Chincoteague Reports

The Journal of Civic Affairs on Chincoteague Island

Categories

  • About Chincoteague Reports
  • Accomack County
  • Accomack County Board of Supervisors
  • Accomack County Planning Commission
  • Announcements
  • Aquaculture
  • Assateague - NPS & WFS
  • Beacon Articles
  • Board of Zoning Appeals
  • Bridge Issues
  • Broadband Technology for the Eastern Shore
  • Captain's Cove Sewage Discharge Application
  • Causeway Signs
  • Cemetery Committee
  • Central Sewage Study - Chincoteague
  • Chincoteague Board of Zoning Appeals
  • Chincoteague Cemetery Committee
  • Chincoteague Comprehensive Plan
  • Chincoteague Planning Commission
  • Chincoteague Town Council
  • Chincoteague Town Government
  • Contact Chincoteague Reports
  • Corrections
  • Current Post
  • Elected Officials - Addresses
  • Elected Officials - Public Comments
  • Greenbackville
  • Ground Water
  • How To Testify
  • Meeting Dates
  • NASA Wallops Flight Facility Rocket Launches
  • Newspapers - Contact Information
  • Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay
  • Terms of Use
  • Town and County Codes
  • Town Council
  • Voting
  • Welcome

Birchwood Motel Proposed Sewer Discharge - Public Hearing June 24

The following Virginia Marine Resources Commission memorandum was sent to Chincoteague Reports by a subscriber.

A copy of the agenda for the June 24 VMRC meeting may be found at:
Agenda

Background information is located at these websites.
Summary

Minutes

MEMORANDUM

FROM:    George H. Badger III
               Environmental Engineer
               Habit Management Division

SUBJECT:    BIRCHWOOD MOTEL, INC.
                    VMRC #05-2780

This is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail, protesting the above-referenced permit. A public hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, June 24, 2008 beginning at 9:30 a.m., at 2600 Washington Avenue, 4th Floor, Newport News, Virginia, to review the application submitted by Birchwood Motel, Inc. The project has been remanded to the Commission by the Circuit Court of Accomack County. Since the community pier has been permitted and constructed, staff will only address the (6) inch sewage discharge pipe.

You are invited to attend this meeting. All interested parties will be afforded the opportunity to comment.

The Marine Resources Commission does not discriminate against individuals with disabilities.  If you are in need of reasonable accommodation due to a disability, please advise George H. Badger, III, at (757) 414-0710 no less than five work days prior to the meeting time and identify your need.


GHB/ghb
HM

June 12, 2008 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Attorney General To Appeal Captain's Cove Decision

Chincoteague Reports received an email from Delegate Lynwood Lewis' Legislative Assistant, Laurie Naismith that forwarded the following message from Virginia Attorney General, Bob McDonnell.

From the Attorney Generals Office RE: Capt Cove

On behalf of the SWCB [ed - State Water Control Board], I filed a Notice of Appeal on Fri. Nov. 16 th , notifying the Circuit Court that we will be presenting Judge Tyler’s ruling to the Court of Appeals to ask it be overturned.  I have also filed a second Stay Order, which I expect Judge Tyler to endorse before the holiday.

November 20, 2007 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Captain’s Cove Receives Judicial Approval to Proceed with Waster Water Treatment Plant

Circuit Court Judge Glen A. Tyler overruled the Virginia State Water Control Board’s ruling against Captain’s Cove Utility Company's application to build and operate a wastewater treatment plant discharging into Swan Gut Creek and Chincoteague Bay.

The Court’s decision concludes this matter unless the Virginia State Attorney General elects to appeal Judge Tyler’s ruling to the Virginia Supreme Court.

Contact information for the Virginia State Attorney General is:

Robert F. McDonnell
Attorney General
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219

804-786-2071

oag.state.va.us

November 08, 2007 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Sunset Bay Initiates Approval Process to Operate Wastewater Treatment Plant

Sunset Bay Utilities has filed an application with the State Corporation Commission requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to establish a wastewater treatment facility on Chincoteague Island.  Public notice of the filing appeared in the November 11, 2007 edition of the Eastern Shore News.  The complete text of the notice can be found below.  Comments on the application or requests for a hearing must be submitted to the State Corporation Commission on or before November 26, 2007

To view Public Comment/Notices of the State Corporation Commission use this link:
Public Comment/Notices

Case and docket information of the State Corporation Commission are available at this website:
Case and docket information

BEGIN PUBLIC NOTICE

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF THE APPLICATION OF SUNSET BAY UTILTIES, INC. FOR A CERTIFICATE
OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
CASE NO. PUE-2007-00005

TAKE NOTICE THAT Sunset Bay Utilities, Inc. (“Company”) filed an application with the State Corporation Commission, (“Commission”) for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to construct and own and operate wastewater facilities on Chincoteague Island in Accomack County.  The company also requests approval of its tariff of proposed rates, rules and regulations of service.

Pursuant to 56-265.2 and 56-265.3 of the Code of the Code of Virginia, the Commission is authorized to grant the application and issue certificates of public convenience and necessity and for the construction of facilities after public notice and an opportunity for a hearing regarding the application.

A copy of the application and accompanying materials is available for public inspection during the regular business hours at the offices of Sunset Bay Utilities Inc., 4001 South Main Street, Chincoteague, Virginia. A copy is also available Monday through Friday, 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Commission’s Document Control Center located on the first floor on the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia.

Any interested person or entity desiring to comment on the application or to request a hearing may do so on or before November 26, 2007 by addressing such comments or requests to:

Joel H. Peck, Clerk, State Corporation Commission
c/o Document Control Center
P.O. Box 2118
Richmond, Virginia 23218-2118. 

All comments and requests should refer to Case No. PUE-2007-0005. A copy of the written comments or requests for hearing must also be sent to:

John H. Burbage, Jr.
President, Sunset Bay Utilities, Inc.
4001 South Main Street
Chincoteague, Virginia 23336

Requests for hearing shall state why a hearing is necessary and why such issues cannot be adequately addressed in written comments.

In the alternative, comments or request for hearing may be submitted electronically by following the instructions available at the commission’s website: http://www.scc.virginia.gov/caseinfo.htm

If no sufficient requests for hearing are received, a formal hearing with oral testimony may not be held, and the Commission may make its decisions administratively, based upon the papers filed in this proceeding.

END OF PUBLIC NOTICE

November 08, 2007 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Proposed Action for Ray’s Shanty Restaurant VPDES Permit

The proposed action for Ray’s Shanty Restaurant VPDES (Virginia Discharge Elimination System) permit in Accomack County is ready for public notice.  The notice will be published in the Eastern Shore News beginning either Saturday, May 12 or Wednesday, May 16.

Download public_notice_letter_rays_shanty_5907.doc

Download environmental_permit_rays_shanty_5907.doc

May 11, 2007 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

VMRC denies Discharge Permit to Birchwood Motel, Inc.

During its February 27, 2007 the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC) voted to deny the permit application of Birchwood Motel, Inc. to discharge up to 35,000 gallons a day of treated sewage effluent into Chincoteague Channel.  The Birchwood Motel planned to use the sewage discharge permit to support a twenty-eight unit condominium development on south Main Street.  The vote to deny the permit was unanimous.

During the same meeting VMRC unanimously approved the Birchwood Motel, Inc.’s application  to construct a 700-foot long by 5-foot wide pier which includes a 30-foot by 8-foot L-head and 10 mooring piles to accommodate four (4) community boat slips

The VRMC permit application reference number is #05-2780

March 01, 2007 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

January 26 Update on Wallops Pond Discharge Proposal

Chincoteague Reports received the following email from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ).  It provides an update on the status of the application of Ray's Shanty for a permit to discharge treated sewage into a drainage ditch near Wallops Pond.  The email is posted below in full and without editing

RE:  Public Notice for Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit proposed for Ray’s Shanty Restaurant Wattsville, VA

Thank you for your interest in the proposed VPDES permit for Ray’s Shanty Restaurant.  The draft permit was public noticed on December 20 and 27, 2006.  In accordance with the VPDES regulations the public comment period lasted 30 days ending on January 19, 2007.  This letter is to address the comments received during the public comment period.    
Alternatives Pursued

Prior to submitting a VPDES application to the DEQ, the owner, Mr. Ray Twiford examined a number of alternatives.  Since there is no central sewage treatment system available to local residents or business owners, Mr. Twiford examined the cost of pumping and hauling all the wastewater directly to another wastewater treatment system.  As with most small business owners and residents Mr. Twiford has found this was not a viable alternative because of the expense. 

Another alternative was land application of the treated wastewater.  This was not a viable alternative due to limited land to store wastewater during winter months when land application is not allowed. 

Another alternative was to seek approval from the local health department for a traditional septic system (septic tank, distribution box, drain field, etc.).  Any system with a capacity of greater than 1200 gallons requires an engineer’s design.  The local health department developed preliminary calculations:  0.6913 Acres as a minimum required space for the drain field up to 9.5 Acres of drain field for protection against groundwater mounding and nitrate loading.  The parcel for the restaurant, parking lot, and treatment system area is 0.7954 Acres.  Therefore this was not a viable alternative.   

Considering his property was zoned business, there is no central sewage treatment system available, unable to land apply, and unable to construct a traditional septic system, Mr. Twiford’s next alternative was to submit a VPDES application to the DEQ.   

Treatment System Design
The application included a description of a proposed secondary treatment system to discharge into an unnamed tributary to Wallops Pond.  The secondary treatment system consists of flow through several units:  an oil and grease trap for kitchen wastewater, septic for sanitary wastewater, chlorination distribution box, fixed activated sludge treatment, recirculation pump tank, to surface discharge.  Sludge would be pumped and hauled to the Bundick Well & Pump septic lagoon for disposal. 

Nutrients
Because of the low volume of flow, 7,000 gallons per day, no further nutrient removal is required by the regulation.  However since this discharge is to a dry ditch stringent standards are imposed by DEQ and placed in the permit to require treatment to the highest quality practical.  In addition treatment and monitoring of nutrients will be required.  This includes treatment to reduce bacteria content to a level safe for fishing and swimming.

Chincoteague Bay
The discharge location would be to an unnamed tributary to Wallops Pond.  The discharge location, as described in the public notice, is located in the Cheseapeake Bay, Atlantic Ocean & Small Coastal Basin as defined by the State Water Control Board Water Quality Standards.  Wallops Pond, Wattsville Branch of Little Mosquito Creek, and Chincoteague Bay are located in this basin. 

Significant Number of Comments Results
Mr. Twiford was informed of the number of comments received by DEQ from the local citizens regarding the public notice for the proposed permit.  Mr. Twiford has examined yet another alternative to bypasses Wallops Pond.  The alternative discharge route would pump the treated effluent to the north to an unnamed tributary to Wattsville Branch of Little Mosquito Creek.  This alternative is more expensive for Mr. Twiford because this discharge route would require the installation of a force main as part of the treatment system in order to pump the discharge to the location and prevent any discharge that may lead back to Wallops Pond.   

The alternative discharge location will enter the Wattsville Branch of Little Mosquito Creek at the headwaters to the VPDES discharge location of NASA Wallops Flight Facility Wastewater Treatment Plant.  The NASA facility is authorized to discharge 300,000 gallons per day into Little Mosquito Creek and this alternative discharge location proposes to discharge 7,000 gallons per day. 

Future Public Notices
The current draft permit is no longer being pursued as a result the DEQ will redraft the permit in order to eliminate Wallops Pond from the discharge route.  Once the permit is redrafted for the alternative discharge location, another public notice and/or notice for public hearing will be placed in the local paper.  The public notice period will be for at least 30 days as required by the VPDES regulations.  The Regional Director will review all responses to comments and requests for public hearing.  If a public hearing is granted then sufficient notice of at least 30 days will be placed in the local paper.  Since you have commented during this past public comment period, you will be notified individually of all public notices regarding this proposed VPDES facility permit.

Thank you again for your comments.  Please contact me at (757) 518-2174 or email mywoodruff@deq.virginia.gov if you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Melinda Woodruff
Water Permit Engineer
DEQ - Tidewater Regional Office
5636 Southern Boulevard
Virginia Beach, VA 23462

(757) 518-2174

January 26, 2007 in Announcements, Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Sewer Outfall Pipe into Chincoteague Channel Proposed

The Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC) plans to review an application for a sewage outfall pipe into and pier extending to Chincoteague Channel during its January 23, 2007 meeting.

The agenda may be found at: VMRC January 23 Agenda

The VMRC website is located at: VMRC Website

The VMRC website contains the following information.

TENTATIVE COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 23, 2007

5. BIRCHWOOD MOTEL, INC., #05-2780, requests authorization to construct a 700-foot long by 5-foot wide pier which includes a 30-foot by 8-foot L-head and 10 mooring piles to accommodate four (4) community boat slips and install a six (6) inch sewage discharge pipe under the proposed pier adjacent to their property along Chincoteague Channel in the Town of Chincoteague, Accomack County. The project is protested by a nearby oyster ground leaseholder and an adjacent property owner.

If you wish to ask questions or to comment on this agenda item send an email to web.info@mrc.virginia.gov  and it will be forwarded to the appropriate staff person.

Eastern Shore Members of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission

Ernest L. Bowden, Jr. of Chincoteague (4219 School Street, Chincoteague, VA  23336)
Appointed in August 2003 by Gov. Mark Warner.   He is a self-employed waterman and President of Eastern Shore Working Watermen's Association.  He has been long time participant in various advisory committees for the Commission.  His term ends on June 30, 2007

J. T. Holland of Northampton County (State Farm,  Box 15,  Nassawadox, VA  23413)
Appointed in July 2003  by Gov. Mark Warner.   He is a State Farm agent from Nassawadox on Virginia’s Eastern Shore.  He served on the Board of Supervisors of Northampton County for 16 years.  He is a long time recreational fisherman. His term ends on June 30, 2007

Virginia Marine Resources Commission Main Office
2600 Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor
Newport News, VA 23607
(757) 247-2200

The Commission Meeting Room is on the 4th Floor

Directions From Norfolk (Approximately 30 minutes)
* Take Interstate 64 West (towards Williamsburg/Richmond)
* Go through the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel
* Take Exit 264 which is Interstate 664 South (towards downtown Newport News)
* Take Exit 6 which is 26th Street (off ramp towards the right)
* Go through the first light which is Huntington Avenue
* The second traffic light is Washington Avenue
* The Agency is in the white ten story building (on right side) at the corner of 26th Street and Washington Avenue.  The Commission Meeting Room is on the 4th Floor

Parking
* Super Block Parking Lot: At the corner of 26th Street and Washington directly across the street from the Agency building (Cost: First two hours are free, each hour after is approximately 50 cents)

January 17, 2007 in Announcements, Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Proposed Discharge of Sewage into Wallops Pond

The following notice appears on the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality website:
DEQ Pubic Notices

The purpose of this notice is to seek public comment on a draft permit from DEQ that will allow the release of treated domestic wastewater from a restaurant into a body of water in Wattsville, Virginia 23483.  Applicant:  Mr. Ray Twiford P.O. Box 13  Wattsville, Virginia 23483, Permit No. VA0092037.  Facility:  Ray’s Shanty 33014 Chincoteague Road Wattsville, Virginia 23483.  The applicant proposes to discharge treated domestic sewage from a wastewater treatment plant, design flow of 0.007 mgd, at a 200-seat restaurant.  The DEQ contact is Melinda Woodruff 5636 Southern Boulevard, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462.  Phone:  757-518-2174.  Email mywoodruff@deq.virginia.gov and Fax 757-518-2009.

Chincoteague Reports is advised that the “body of water” is Wallops Pond.  This body of water drains into Mosquito Creek and that creek drains into Chincoteague Bay public comment period ends on January 19, 2007.

Due to the January 19 closing date for public comment, those who wish to have more detailed information, to comment upon the application, or to request that the comment period be extended must contact DEQ immediately

DEQ Contact Person

Melinda Woodruff
757-518-2174
mywoodruff@deq.virginia.gov
Fax  757-518-2009

DEQ Tidewater Regional Office
5636 Southern Blvd.
Virginia Beach, VA 23462


 

 

January 15, 2007 in Announcements, Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

DEQ Notification of Decision on Captain's Cove Permit Application

The following email was received on September 21.  The content represents notification by DEQ of the final decision on the permit application for wastewater discharge by the developers of Captain's Cove.  The email is shown here in its entirety

FW: Captains Cove Pending Permit Application
"Smithson,Robert" <resmithson@deq.virginia.gov>
Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:55:26 PM

Mr. Troxler:

RE:  Captain’s Cove Development, State Water Control Board Decision

On September 6, 2006 the Water Control Board accepted DEQ staff’s recommendation to deny the Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) permit based upon information provided by consulting State agencies and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) regulations.  The decision of the Board was not based on support or opposition of interested parties, but was made based upon regulatory requirements.  Those requirements, specifically, are 9 VAC 25-370 et. Seq, Policy for the Protection of Water Quality in Virginia’s Shellfish Growing Waters and 9 VAC 25-260 et. Seq., the Virginia Water Quality Standards Regulation,  Part 270.  Because the proposed VPDES permit for Captain’s Cove could not be issued in compliance with the Department’s regulations, the staff recommended denial of the permit and the Board agreed with that recommendation.

Thank you for your interest and input concerning this controversial proposal.  If you have any other questions concerning the Board’s action on the matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

September 21, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

September 6, 2006 State Water Control Board Denies Permit To Captain’s Cove Group, LLC

Members of the Chincoteague Preservationists called Chincoteague Reports to report that they attended the September 6 meeting of the State Water Control Board during which the Board heard final presentations on the permit application of Captain’s Cove Group, LLC to discharge treated effluent into Swan’s gut Creek.   The State Water Control Board denied the permit application of Captain’s Cove Group, LLC.

Details of the action of the State Water Control Board will be posted as soon as they are available.

Those interested in the details of the State Water Control Board's proceedings and what actions may follow their decision should consider attending the Thursday, September 7 meeting of the Chesapeake Preservationists.  Their meeting will be held in the Greenbackville Fire House at 6:30 p.m.

September 06, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

The Effects of Discharging Treated Effulent into Coastal Bays

Dr. Kent Price spoke at the Greenbackville meeting on June 15 about the scientific understanding of the effects of discharging treated effluent into a coastal bay (see summary post below).  He provided a shortened version of his presentation for the public record during the June 21 public hearing conducted by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality.   

Dr. Price has studied the Inland Bays of Delaware since 1968. He is Associate Professor University of Delaware in the College of Marine Studies.  His research activities include: Pollution ecology and coastal bays management; reproductive strategies of water regulation in sharks, skates, and rays; fisheries ecology; physiological ecology; development of aquaculture in the U.S. Additional information about Dr. Price and The Center for Inland Bays of Delaware may be found at:

http://www.inlandbays.org/

The following text contains highlights of his June 15 presentation to citizens in Greenbackville,VA.  This presentation was shorten and presented for the public record during the June 21 public hearing conducted by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 

Thanks to the Chincoteague Preservationists for providing the images that accompanied Dr. Price's presentation.

Summary of Dr. Price's Remarks

*Forty years ago Rehoboth, Delaware faced the same kind of permitting decision that Accomack County now faces with Captain’s Cove.  The decision was made to allow the discharge of “treated effluent” into Rehoboth Bay.  During the ensuing years the treated effluent killed all the eel grass and widgeon grass.  This has been replaced by seaweed that does not support the same marine ecology as the grasses.  Fish populations have been reduced in number and replaced in species from those which require nominal levels of oxygen to those which require minimal oxygen.  Crabs, oysters, clams, bay scallops and mussels have disappeared from the Bay.

*The seaweed that replaced the native aquatic grasses grows rapidly, breaks off, washes on shore and rots.  The rotting biomass produces hydrogen sulfide gas in such quantity that it is highly offensive to boaters and those who live on the shore.  The rotting weed also attracts flies and maggots in large numbers.  Because the City and State have been unable to contain the rotting seaweed and because Rehoboth Bay is virtually dead, local and state governments have committed to end the discharge of effluent into Rehoboth Bay.  By 2014 they will complete work on an ocean outfall pipe. The estimated capital cost of this for Rehoboth Beach is $36,630,000.  The estimated capital cost of the project for a regional system to support all of Sussex County is $50,100,000.  [figures taken from Rehoboth Beach Effluent Study: Evaluation of Wasterwater Discharge Alternatives dated January 13, 2006 prepared by Sterns & Wheler, LLC Environmental Engineers and Scientists www.inlandbays.org/cib_pm/pdfs/Copithorn-RB-Eff-Disposal-Study-11306-STAC.pdf]

To make his point, Dr. Price brought a bucket of seaweed that had washed up on the shore of Rehoboth Bay.  He was absolute in declaring that if the Captain’s Cove permit is granted, Chincoteague Bay will degrade in the same way the Rehoboth Bay degraded.

Download raking_sea_lettuce_from_harvester_2p.jpg

Download raking_sea_lettuce_from_harvester_p.jpg

*In order for desirable species of fish (such as rockfish, shad, flounder) to inhabit water an oxygen level of 5ml/ liter of water is required.  Rehoboth Bay currently shows between 1ml/liter and 0ml/liter.  This low level of oxygen supports mostly bait fish such as mummichog, killifish and menhaden.

Download dissolved_oxygen_criteria_p.JPG

*The change brought to Rehoboth Bay by the treated effluent has also brought about dangerous changes in the microbiology of the water.  Rehoboth Bay is now home to twenty types of disease causing organisms that were not resident in the Bay before the treated effluent entered the ecosystem.  Two of those organisms are types of pfisteria.  Those organisms are particularly dangerous and were the cause for great alarm in Maryland not long ago and remains so in the Pocomoke River.

Download fish_kill_905_torquay_canal_rehoboth_p.JPG

*The treated effluent to be discharged into Swan’s Gut Creek has the perfect balance of nitrogen and phosphorus to stimulate plant growth.  But the nature of these chemicals kills naturally occurring eel grass and widgeon grass while it stimulates the growth of noxious seaweeds.

Download noxious_seaweed_shore_of_rehoboth_bay_605p.JPG

*The 900,000 gallon per day quantity of “treated effluent” is supposed to be sufficiently pure to be classed as “drinkable” by health agencies.  That means the water is considered to be “fresh.”  Pumping 900,000 gallons of fresh water into Swan’s Gut Creek will kill the clam and oyster population of the creek and surrounding waters of Chincoteague Bay by altering the salinity of the water and changing the pH of the water.

*During the discussion of whether to permit treated effluent to be discharged into Delaware Bay a closed loop system was discussed and rejected.  At the time it would have cost about $1million to install the system.  Now the State and City will spend at least $30 million to eliminate the treated effluent from Rehoboth Bay.  The closed loop system that relies upon above ground irrigation is an option for the developers of Captain’s Cove.  They reject it as too expensive.

end summary of Dr. Price's remarks

August 25, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

DEQ Recommends Denial of Captain’s Cove Permit Application for Sewage Discharge

A resident of Accomack County recently wrote to Governor Kaine to express concerns about Captain’s Cove application for a permit to discharge sewage into Swan’s Gut Creek and Chincoteague Bay.  The Honorable L. Preston Bryant, Jr., Virginia Secretary of Natural Resources, answered that inquiry on behalf of the Govenor by letter dated August 15, 2006.  The final paragraph of Secretary Bryant’s letter reads in its entirety as follows:

“The Captain’s Cove project is complicated, and DEQ [Department of Environmental Quality] has considered all information that has been received from the public, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, and the Virginia Department of Health.  After reviewing all information and comments, the DEQ staff has recommended to the State Water Control Board that they deny the permit application.  The decision is likely to come before the Board at the next meeting on September 6.”

August 17, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Oyster Bay II and Captain's Cove Permit Applications

RE: Oyster Bay II and Captain's Cove Permit Applications
"Thompson,Debra"
<dlthompson@deq.virginia.gov>Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:03:34 AM
To:Bill Troxler <billtroxler@verizon.net>
Cc:"Smithson,Robert" <resmithson@deq.virginia.gov>; "McConathy,James" <jrmcconathy@deq.virginia.gov>

Good Morning Mr. Troxler:

Oyster Bay II Permit Application Status:

Currently, the receiving stream is classified as "condemned forshellfishing", which means that shellfish in the designated area may be moved to another location, be given a period of time to "cleanse" and then be marketed for human consumption.  With the addition of the proposed discharge from the Oyster Bay II project, the receiving stream would be reclassified  as "prohibited for shellfishing", which means that shellfish in the designated area may not be used at all or moved to a new location for cleansing; basically the shellfish resource is completely lost.

With the above information, Division of Shellfish Sanitation (DSS) and Virginia Marine Resource Commission (VMRC) have not given positive comments regarding this specific Oyster Bay II discharge into these designated shellfish waters. DSS comments that it will reclassify the receiving stream to "prohibited" and VMRC states that "...the proposed discharge will have an effect on the shellfish use now and in the foreseeable future."   Therefore, the Department of Environmental Quality will not process the proposed permit request.  The Commonwealthof Virginia is protective of its shellfish resources, and will not approve the issuance of a permit for a discharge that will have an adverse effect on current or future shellfish use.

I have spoken with Mr. Buford Rowland regarding this new information and sent correspondence to him on Monday, July 17, 2006 offering a few recommendations/options. 

It is recommended that: (1)the permit application be withdrawn, or, (2) a soci-economic hearing be requested, or, (3) an alternative treatment and disposal method be considered for the sewage generated from the proposed project.  A request for a soci-economic hearing does not mean that a permit will be granted, it is a factual/information hearing for evaluation of the soci-economic need for the discharge permit verses the loss of a shellfish resource.  Most recently, a soci-economic public hearing was held for the proposed Captains Cove permit request; the decision on this project will be made by our State Water Control Board at their next meeting in Richmond on September 6, 2006.

I hope this information is helpful to you.  If you have any additional questions/comments, please do not hesitate to call/contact me at our Virginia Beach office,

Debra L. Thompson
Environmental Engineer Senior
VA Department of Environmental Quality
5636 Southern Boulevard
Virginia Beach, VA  23462
(757) 518-2162   phone
(757) 518-2103   FAX
dlthompson@deq.virginia.gov
Office Info: http://www.deq.virginia.gov/regions/tidewater.html

RE: Oyster Bay II and Captain's Cove Permit Applications
"Smithson,Robert"
<resmithson@deq.virginia.gov>
Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:39:56 PM
To:Bill Troxler <billtroxler@verizon.net>

The fate of Captains Cove application will lie with the State Water
Control Board on Sept. 6th.  No decision will be made until then.  VMRC
does not make recommendations of approval or denial on DEQ permit
applications.  They are an advisory Agency only concerning the presence
or absence of a shellfish resource. 

As Mrs. Thompson has previously stipulated, The Commonwealth of Virginia
is protective of its shellfish resources, and will not typically approve
the issuance of a permit that will have an adverse effect on current or
future shellfish use.  The DEQ website is not intended to give blow by
blow updates on any application status: it only announces that an
application was received and is under review.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Troxler
[mailto:billtroxler@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:46 AM
To: Thompson,Debra; Robert E. Smithson
Subject: Oyster Bay II and Captain's Cove Permit Applications

Good Morning Debra  and Bob,

We have corresponded during the past  few months regarding discharge permit applications in Accomack County for Oyster Bay II and Captain's Cove.  I appreciate your previous help in understanding the status of these applications.

Several residents of Oyster Bay II advised me this morning that during the Saturday meeting of the Oyster Bay II board directors of the homeowners association, it was announced that DEQ has denied the Oyster Bay II sewage discharge application. Furthermore, it was announced that VMRC has recommended denial of Captain's Cove's discharge permit application.

I checked the DEQ website for an update but found no change in status of these two permits.

Can you advise me of the status of the Oyster Bay II and Captain's Cove permit applications? Are they still pending or have they been denied?

My adviser also stated that Captain's Cove Developer plans to appeal the permit application denial to a group identified as the "Virginia Citizens Review Board."  Is this body real or imagined?  Does my correspondent really mean the State Water Control Board?

THANK YOU for any information, guidance or advice you can provide to me.

Bill Troxler

July 18, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Captain’s Cove Developer Presents His Case

On Monday June 19 at 7 p.m. in Wolff’s Sandwich Shop in Atlantic, Accomack County Supervisor Ron S. Wolff held his monthly constituent meeting.  He invited the developer of Captain’s Cove to attend and make a presentation explaining the pending permit application for discharging treated effluent into Swan’s Gut Creek.  Mr. Bob Warfield, one of three principals in the development partnership, several of his staff and civil engineer Mr. John Salm represented Captain’s Cove Group, LLC.  Approximately forty-five citizens attended the meeting. 

Supervisor Wolff opened the meeting shortly after 7 p.m. with a few announcements of activities in the county during the previous month and with a request that everyone attend the June 28 public hearing on the proposed interim zoning ordinance.

The Presenters
The presentation was made almost entirely by Mr. Salm.  Mr. Warfield interjected frequently with clarifications of various points and to provide information about Captain’s Cove development.  The case made by Mr. Salm and Mr. Warfield was clear and may be persuasive to many.  It seems as though the developer has gone to great lengths to do the “right thing” within his financial constraints.   

It is also useful to know that Mr. Warfield has years of experience in dealing with the issue of waste water.  He is chairman of the Maryland Department of the Environment’s Bay Restoration Fund Advisory Committee.  This group recommends ways to reduce nutrient loadings to state waters and identifies revenue sources for cleaning and preserving the Chesapeake Bay and Maryland's coastal bays.  He has first hand, detailed knowledge and understanding about sewage treatment plants from the large ones in Baltimore and Washington, D.C. to small ones in municipalities on the Eastern Shore.  He was quick to offer facts and examples throughout the presentation.  Mr. Warfield is personally engaged in the Captain’s Cove project and sewer permit application.  To his credit, he did not send a team of hired experts to make the case on his behalf.   

Highlights of the Developer’s Presentation Explaining the Proposed Sewage Treatment Plant at Captain’s Cove.

Background on Captain’s Cove
Captain’s Cove contains 4,800 platted lots.  The average size of these lots is slightly less than 10,000 square feet.  That is less area than the typical one-quarter of an acre lot found in most single family, suburban developments.  Captain’s Cove and Trails End were platted in the 1970s BEFORE Accomack County had implemented zoning ordinances.  Today, no newly platted lot in Accomack County agricultural land may be less than 30,000 square feet.

The original developer of Captain’s Cove first launched Ocean Pines in Maryland and then opened Captain’s Cove and remained the developer of the property until three years ago.  Ocean Pines began development in 1971 and is nearly built to full capacity of its 7,000 lots.  At great public expense, Worcester County recently took over and improved the central sewage system in Ocean Pines.  Today an outfall pipe discharges the treated effluent from Ocean Pines into Sinepuxent Bay.

When Mr. Warfield and Mr. Glick purchased Captain’s Cove they knew that the 4,800 lots did not have sufficient infrastructure to support complete development of the project.  Of all the infrastructure improvements (such as new roads, new club house, and improvements to the marina) going on in Captain’s Cove, the sewer treatment plant is the most costly.  However, Mr. Warfield made the point several times that he and his partners would not be the ones to bear the cost of the sewage treatment plant.  Lot owners would be charged to support the operating and capital costs of the utility.  Existing lot owners would be charged to connect to the proposed central sewage system.

What Does a Sewage Treatment Plant Do?
A sewage treatment plant is a factory that accepts sewage as input, processes the sewage to kill pathogens and to extract nutrients (mainly nitrogen and phosphorus).  The output of the factory has two components:  1) sludge which contains solids from the waste stream and some nutrients and 2) effluent which is water that will contain some level of nutrients.   The nutrient level of the effluent is entirely determined by the quality of the sewage treatment plant.

The sewage treatment plant proposed by Captain’s Cove kills pathogens and removes approximately 93% of the nitrogen in the waste water stream.  The sewage is treated twice by banks of ultraviolet lights to kill pathogens.  The treated water then passes through a chlorination process as a back up to the ultraviolet exposure.  Then the effluent passes into holding tanks where it is acted upon by micro organisms that ingest nitrogen and excrete it as gas into the atmosphere.  Nitrogen makes up 78% of the volume of our atmosphere.  In its pure form, nitrogen is not considered to be an airborne pollutant.  While in the holding tanks, bio-solids settle out of the wastewater and develop sludge.

Two issues dominate the discussion of a sewage treatment plant:  how to dispose of the sludge and what to do with the treated effluent.

In the case of Captain’s Cove the developer has decided against trucking the sludge to a lagoon in Atlantic.  He is exploring ways to sell the sludge as commercial fertilizer and turn the profits from those sales into a revenue stream to partially support the Captain’s Cove sewage treatment plant.  The proposed destination of the treated effluent is Swan’s Gut Creek.

What Does a Septic System Do?
A septic system separates humans from pathogens and slowly releases untreated effluent into the groundwater.  The holding tank of a septic system is technically called a “clarifier.”  Its job is to allow solids to settle out of the waste stream.  On occasion, septic tanks have to be cleaned of this deposited material.  The effluent that enters the drain field of a septic system is not treated to remove nutrients.  These ultimately flow into the groundwater and into nearby water streams.

Planning Numbers Relating to Captain’s Cove Group LLC Permit Application

  • Scale of Captain’s Cove
    Total number of lots in Captain’s Cove = 4,800
    Total number of lots held by private owners = 3,000
    Total number of lots owned by the developer = 1,800
    Approximate number of houses currently built in Captain’s Cove = 637
    Current number of houses hooked into the existing sewage treatment plant =237
    Approximate number of houses in Captain’s Cove using septic system= 400
    Approximate amount of treated effluent used to irrigate golf course = 35,000 gallons per day
  • Calculating Nutrient Discharge
    Sewage output of a three bedroom home = 180 gallons per day
    Nitrogen output from a septic system = 10mg/liter
    Annual discharge of nitrogen from all Captain’s Cove homes on septic = 107,000 pounds
    Annual discharge of nitrogen from all Captain’s Cove homes if permit granted – 11,000 pounds
    The difference between building out Captains Cove with individual septic systems and building out the development with the proposed central sewage treatment plant is that septic systems put an additional 96,000 pounds of nitrogen per year into the ground water.
  • Flow and Volume of Swan’s Gut Creek
    Proposed effluent as a percent of the volume of Swan’s Gut Creek – 2.12%
    Proposed effluent as a percent of the flow of Swan’s Gut Creek <10%
    Fresh water currently flowing in Swan’s Gut Creek = 10.7 Cubic feet per second
    Extra fresh water flow generated by proposed effluent discharge = 1.4 Cubic feet per second
    Current flow of Swan’s Gut Creek is about 10.7 million gallons per day
    Planned effluent discharge rate is 180 gallons/hour
  • Condemned and Prohibited Shell fishing areas
    Federal regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration require a prohibited zone around a sewer treatment plant that discharges any form of effluent into a watercourse.  The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has no choice but to put in place a prohibited zone around the proposed Captain’s Cove discharge pipe.  The size of the prohibited area is determined by federal regulations and by water sampling. Prohibited areas do not necessarily ban fishing, crabbing or swimming.
  • Existing prohibited shell fishing grounds in Swan’s Gut Creek = 65.61 acres
    Proposed prohibited shell fishing grounds Swan’s Gut Creek = 37.82 acres
    Proposed prohibited shell fishing grounds in Chincoteague Bay = 260.69 acres
  • Total prohibited shell fishing grounds – 379.31 acres

(n.b. Numbers as presented above total to 364.12 acres not the total of 379.31 stated by Mr. Salm.  Source of error unknown.)

The Nitrogen Budget of the Proposed Plant
The proposed sewer treatment plant would produce 97,000 pounds of nitrogen each year when all 4,800 lots have homes built on them.  This nitrogen would be discharged into Swan’s Gut Creek. 

The proposed sewer plant disposes of the incoming nitrogen contained in the sewage in three ways:

1.  In gas created by micro-organism during sewage treatment and discharged into the air = 88% of the total nitrogen present in the input sewage.

2.  In the sludge produced during the sedimentation process of treatment = 5% of the total nitrogen in the input sewage.

3.  In surface water produced as effluent and discharged into Swan’s Gut Creek = 7% of the total nitrogen in the input sewage.

Proposed System
The developer proposes to build a “Biological Nutrient Removal System” (BNR).  This same type of plant is termed an “Enhanced Nutrient Removal System (ENR) in Maryland.  Maryland is currently upgrading all of its municipal sewage systems to ENR plants.   BNR or ENR plants achieve high levels of nutrient removal.  The operating standards require no more than 3mg of nitrogen / liter of effluent and 0.03 mg of phosphorus / liter of effluent.  By comparison, an individual septic system is budgeted to deliver 60mg of nitrogen/liter of effluent to the ground water.

Proposed Sewer Service Plan for the 4,800 lots in Captain’s Cove
2358 privately owned lots are potential users of the proposed sewer system
       (about 400 of these lots are currently served by individual septic systems)
<+/- 600 lots may not be developed because of EPA constraints on wetlands
1605 lots owned by the developer are planned to be put on the proposed system
237 homes are currently served by the existing sewer plant at Captain’s Cove

                              2,358 + 600 + 1,605 + 237 = 4,800

Points Made by the Developer

1.  Swan’s Gut Creek is dying with or without the proposed sewer treatment plant.  The septic systems currently operating along the watershed of the creek will continue to add nutrients to the water stream.  As new houses are built with in-ground septic systems the nutrient load will increase.  The proposed sewer treatment plant will reduce the nutrient load into Swan’s Gut Creek and Chincoteague Bay by 96,000 pounds of nitrogen per year when Captain’s Cove is fully built with homes on all 4,800 lots.

2.  Without the proposed sewer treatment plant the area of condemned and prohibited shell fish grounds in Swan’s Gut Creek and Chincoteague Bay will be expanded by the Shellfish Division of the Department of Environmental Quality.  The expansion will be the result of the increased nutrient load delivered to the water system by additional individual septic systems coming on line as the development builds out to its potential size.

3.  Application of the treated effluent to the land as irrigation water instead of discharging it into Swan’s Gut Creek is not financially feasible.  Captain’s Cove Group, LLC does not own sufficient land to apply the effluent.  To do so would require roughly 1,300 acres.  They do not
have the money to purchase that amount of land.  Additionally, financial constraints limit the distance over which the effluent can be pumped to a dispersal site to less than two miles.

4.  Use of pre-treatment or “above ground” individual septic systems is not permitted by the County in Captain’s Cove.  The developer stated that the lots are too small and the water table is too high.  To create an above ground septic system requires twenty-two inches of unsaturated soil above the water table.  That is not present in most of Captain’s Cove. (Note:  see comments below from Supervisor Wanda Thornton on this measurement detail)

Comments Offered by Public Officials

County Supervisor Ron S. Wolff:  Several times during the presentation, Mr. Wolff asked the developer questions regarding the presentation.  At the close of the meeting, Mr. Wolff stated that he opposed approval of the permit and believed that the only suitable system was one that did not include an outfall pipe into any body of water.  Mr. Wolff’s position stated during the meeting is that the developer must redesign the system to provide for ground dispersal of treated effluent.

Mr. E. Phillip Hickman, Accomack Planning Commission:  Concurred with Mr. Wolff’s position and added that there existed, adjacent to Captain’s Cove a parcel of 5,000 acres which was both suitable for ground application and owned by someone who was prepared to make such arrangements with the developer.

County Supervisor Wanda Thornton:  Ms. Thornton did not attend the meeting.  However, the following day I asked her about the regulations regarding approval of individual above ground septic systems.  She was adamant that the developer was in error by stating that twenty-two inches of soil above water table are required.  She reported that the requirement is six inches of undisturbed soil above the water table.  She further stated that she and her husband had recently installed such a system on their property and that she was thoroughly familiar with the regulations.  Ms. Thornton stated that she opposed any permit application for discharge of effluent that would cause the condemnation or prohibition of shell fishing in any new areas of local waterways.  She believes the developer should be required to redesign the system to provide either for ground dispersal of treated effluent or implementation of individual, above ground septic systems without reliance on construction of a new central sewage system.

The meeting concluded at 8:54 

Notes Transcribed by Bill Troxler

N.B.  These notes do not constitute the public record of this meeting.  The information contained herein is offered in good faith, is presented as accurately as possible, is thought to be a complete account of the proceedings.  These notes are  intended to be a public service devoid of political commentary for those who are interested in following the activities of Chincoteague Government. Notes of the meeting are recorded, transcribed and distributed by volunteers who receive no financial compensation for their efforts.

June 24, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

June 21, 2006 Public Hearing

Summary of June 21 DEQ Public Hearing On
Captain’s Cove Group, LLC Application
For a Permit to Discharge Treated
Effluent into Swan’s Gut Creek

On June 21 at 7 p.m. in the auditorium of Arcadia High School, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) held a public hearing to receive input on the pending application of Captain’s Cove Group, LLC for a permit to discharge treated effluent into Swan’s Gut Creek.   The auditorium seated approximately 500 people.  Few seats were empty and many remained standing in the back of the auditorium.   Mr. Bob Warfield and Mr. John Salms represented the interests of Captain’s Cove Group, LLC as developer and project engineer.

NOTE:  The public record on this permit application will remain open until 4:30 p.m. July 7.    Letters may be directed to:

Robert E. Smithson
DEQ, Tidewater Regional Office
5636 Southern Boulevard
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462
resmithson@deq.virginia.gov.

Final Decision: The State Water Control Board will make the final decision on Captain’s Cove Group, LLC’s permit application during its September 6, 2006 meeting.

DEQ Presentation
Preceding the public hearing and beginning at 6:30 p.m. DEQ officials answered questions from the audience about the permit application and the process of approval.  This activity was not made part of the public record.  At 7 p.m. the hearing officer convened the public hearing.  Robert Smithson of DEQ made a short presentation describing the permit application of Captain’s Cove Group, LLC.

New Information Presented by DEQ
Two significant new items of information were presented by Mr. Smithson.  These have to do with the acreage that would be closed to shell fishing if the permit is approved and the viability of shellfish grounds in Chincoteague Bay off the coast of Captain’s Cove.

The Division of Shellfish Sanitation of DEQ reviewed its original calculation which projected that issuance of the permit would force closure of some 400 acres of shellfish grounds.  Their original calculations were made using incorrect data including wrong values for nutrient loads in the effluent and the wrong amount of outflow.  The correct data reduced the acreage that would be closed by issuance of the permit down to 143 acres.

At the close of his presentation, Mr. Smithson read into the record and in its entirety a letter dated June 20, 2006 from the Virginia Marine Resources Commission.  This letter retracted the department’s previous conclusion that the shellfish fishery off of Captain’s Cove was not productive.

These shellfish grounds had been sampled by the developer in August 2005.  They were sampled again by VMRC on two occasions during June 2006.  All of these efforts indicated that the shellfish fishery that would be affected by the proposed effluent discharge of Captain’s Cove was not commercially viable.  Watermen in the area protested that this conclusion was wrong.  They campaigned aggressively to get a third survey of the shellfish grounds in areas they knew to be productive.  This third survey produced clam harvests at rates between 604 clams/hour and 1,440 clams per hour.  Harvest rates at those levels identify a commercially viable shellfish fishery.  Thus VMRC has re-designated the region of Chincoteague Bay off the coast of Captain’s Cove as having viable recreational shellfish grounds and small areas of commercially viable grounds.

This change in designation is highly significant.  The Virginia State Water Control Board (SWCB) is the body charged with making the final decision on the permit application of Captain’s Cove Group, LLC.  Their operating regulations require them to reject any discharge permit application if the proposed discharge of effluent would condemn or prohibit shell fishing in areas that are commercially productive or that have the potential to become commercially productive in the future. 

Presentation by the Developer’s Engineer
Mr. John Salms was given fifteen minutes to present the details of the project.  His presentation at Accomack County Supervisor Ron S. Wolff’s June 19 constituents meeting was far more detailed than the one offered during the June 21 public hearing.  For detailed summary of that presentation see the post titled "Captain’s Cove Developer Presents His Case" in this category.  No new information was offered regarding the developer’s plans.

Comments by the Public
Citizens were offered three minutes to address the public record.  More than one hundred people signed up to speak. 

Delegate Lynnwood Lewis opened the public commentary by making a rational, measured but decisive call to reject the permit application.

Supervisor Ron S. Wolff delivered to the public record a unanimously passed resolution of the Accomack County Board of Superiors that called for DEQ to: 1) recognize the extreme importance of the aquatic environment to citizens, 2) apply great caution in granting permits that have the potential to cause irremediable degradation in the quality of public waters, 3) delay the approval of the permit until further studies and alternatives can be considered, and 4)  reconsider the State’s apparent policy of assumed continued degradation of water resources in light of  newer technologies and scientific understanding.  The full text of the resolution is attached in the form of a pdf and may be found on the Board of Supervisors website at: 

http://www.esva.net/~accomack/new_site_2005_07/Board%20of%20Supervisors/Agendas/Current%20Agenda/RESOLUTION%20OF%20CONCERN%20-%20Captian's%20Cove%20VPDES.pdf

Or at this shorter address:  http://tinyurl.com/zu54o

Dr. Kent Price who spoke at the Greenbackville meeting on June 16 provided a shortened version of his presentation for the public record.  Dr. Price’s presentation has been summarized in a previous email.  Additional information about Dr. Price and The Center for Inland Bays of Delaware may be found at:

http://www.inlandbays.org/

Two images from Dr. Price's presentation are available at the following links.  These images show harvesting of noxious seaweed that replaced the naturally occurring sea grasses when treated effluent was discharged into Rehoboth Bay.

Download raking_sea_lettuce_from_harvester_2.jpg

Download raking_sea_lettuce_from_harvester.jpg

A homeowner in Captain’s Cove spoke as an individual not representing the developer or the home owners’ association.  He brought with him for the public record a petition signed by more than 300 of the 640 homeowners in Captain’s Cove calling for DEQ to deny the permit application.  A number of Captain’s Cove residents spoke in opposition to the permit.

Various scientists spoke about the certainty of environmental harm that the proposed discharge of treated effluent would bring to Chincoteague Bay.  Board members of the Assateague Coastal Trust and the Coast Keeper spoke, as did Ph.Ds.  in the fields of chemistry and biology.  No scientist agreed that this proposed plant was the best solution.  One scientist made the point that the proposed BNR plant was an excellent technology, but was wrong for Chincoteague Bay.  The plant would be welcomed and would improve conditions along large flowing bodies of water such as the Potomac, James and Elizabeth Rivers.  But such a plant would be a disaster for Chincoteague Bay.

Citizen speakers represented a cross-section of local residents including watermen, farmers, homeowners, young, old, born-heres and come-heres.  All spoke against approval of the permit.

Mr. Warfield and one other person spoke in favor of the permit as the best solution to an existing problem and one that would reduce expansion of the problem as Captain’s Cove completes its development.

The hearing concluded at 10:35 p.m.

Notes Transcribed by Bill Troxler

N.B.  These notes do not constitute the public record of this meeting.  The information contained herein is offered in good faith, is presented as accurately as possible, is thought to be a complete account of the proceedings.  These notes are  intended to be a public service devoid of political commentary for those who are interested in following the activities of Chincoteague Government. Notes of the meeting are recorded, transcribed and distributed by volunteers who receive no financial compensation for their efforts.

June 23, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

5-25-06 Oyster Bay II Sewer Application

A letter dated May 25, 2006 from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) reports that Oyster Bay II Water & Sewer Company, has applied for a permit to discharge treated effluent from a domestic sewage treatment plant servicing ninety-four single family lots. The effluent would be discharged into Chincoteague Channel.

An email was sent to DEQ to ask for an update on the status of this application and received the following response.

RE: Oyster Bay II Water & Sewer Company Application

FROM: Thompson,Debra - dlthompson@deq.virginia.gov

Monday, June 12, 2006 8:48:58 AM

To: Bill Troxler

Good Morning Mr. Troxler:

Oyster Bay II Water & Sewer Company has filed an application to discharge treated effluent (approximately 60,000 gallons per day) from a tertiary sewage treatment plant. The proposed discharge location is into Chincoteague Channel. DEQ does not have a "notification" list , however the Department does maintain a VPDES Permit web page listing all the permit applications each Regional office has received. You may locate this page at www.deq.virginia.gov once the page opens, click on permit tracking" under the Permit Tolls category. Next go to "water applications" and then "View Active Permit Applications for VPDES" and scroll down to permit in "TRO" (Tidewater Regional Office).

You may always contact me for any additional information that you may want or need on any permit application we are processing in this office.

Any permit that is drafted for issuance is required to be noticed in the local newspaper. The specific content of the permit is then advertised; in this case it would be in the Eastern Shore News. The DEQ webpage also lists all permits that are at public notice, and in which newspaper it is printed.

At this point, Oyster Bay II does not have a complete application and I am still waiting for information from the Va Dept of Health and the Division of Shellfish Sanitation and the VA Marine Resources Commission.

I hope this information is helpful,

Debra Thompson

(757) 518-2162

END OF DEQ EMAIL RESPONSE

Additional information on this application will be posted when it arrives.

June 19, 2006 in Sewage Discharge Into Chincoteague Bay | Permalink

Recent Posts

  • RON WOLFF FORUM AT CAPTAINS
  • August 2012 Chincoteague CCP Newsletter
  • Town Council members to be sworn in
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: Ron Wolff Forum at Captain's Cove Marina on April 16
  • Statement of Fish and Wildlife's Wendi Weber at Congressional Hearing
  • Statement of Wanda Thornton at Congressional Hearing
  • Statement of Chincoteague Mayor Tarr at Congresssional Hearing
  • Congressional Hearing on Chincoteague: Witness Statement
  • February 17 Congressional Hearing on Beach Access - Available on Line
  • Who is running in Chincoteague's May 1 election?

FeedBlitz

  • Subscribe to Chincoteague Reports
    Enter your Email


    Preview

Search Chincoteague Reports


Useful Links

  • Accomack County Board of Supervisors
  • Accomack County Calendar
  • Accomack County Comprehensive Plan
  • Accomack County Website
  • Chincoteague Town Website
  • Chincoteague Audio and Minutes of Council, Commission & Committee Meetings
  • Chincoteague Town Calander
  • Chincoteague Town Council: Agendas & Minutes
  • Chincoteague's DRAFT Comprehenisve Plan
  • Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
  • Virginia Department of Envirnomental Quality
  • Virginia Institute of Marine Science